EXPLAINING THE LIMITS OF OLSSON'S IMPOSSIBILITY RESULT
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Explaining The Limits of Olssonʼs Impossibility Result
In his groundbreaking book, "Against Coherence," Erik Olsson presents an ingenious impossibility theorem which appears to show that there is no informative relationship between probabilistic measures of coherence and higher likelihood of truth. Although Olsson's result provides an important insight into probabilistic models of epistemological coherence, the scope of his negative result is more ...
متن کاملImpossibility: the Limits of Science and the Science of Limits
"̂T^ H A T P O T E N T I A L F O R T E 1 E E N R I C H M E N T O F I s c i e n c e is w h a t B a r r o w h a s se t o u t t o e x p l o r e _JL i n Impossibility. A p r o f e s s o r o f a s t r o n o m y a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f S u s s e x i n E n g l a n d , B a r r o w w r i t e s w i t h g r e a t s c h o l a r s h i p , e l e g a n c e a n d w i t . H e classif ies t h e l i m i ...
متن کاملImpossibility Result for Coherence Rankings
If we receive information from multiple independent and partially reliable information sources, then whether we are justified to believe these information items is affected by how reliable the sources are, by how well the information coheres with our background beliefs and by how internally coherent the information is. We consider the following question. Is coherence a separable determinant of ...
متن کاملA Bypass of Cohen's Impossibility Result
Detecting illegal resource access in the setting of network communication or grid computing is similar to the problem of virus detection as put forward by Fred Cohen in 1984. We disucuss Cohen’s impossibility result on virus detection, and introduce “risk assessment of security hazards”, a notion that is decidable for a large class of program behaviors.
متن کاملAggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
The concern of this paper is the aggregation of sets of rationally connected judgments that the members of a group individually endorse into a corresponding, collectively endorsed set of judgments. After documenting the need for various groups to aggregate judgments, we explain how this task is challenged by the "doctrinal" or "discursive" paradox. We then show that this paradox is not just an ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Southern Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0038-4283
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00083.x